|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Main page > Products > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts - The weekly bulletin > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (22) 710 Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (22) 710May 19-25, 2008 Main political trends of the weekTendencies formed as a result of government reshuffle in mid May continued strengthening last week. Dmitry Medvedev started his second week in office from putting his pre-election promises into practice. In particular, he held meetings devoted to fighting corruption and ensuring independence of the judicial branch; as a result two working groups were formed. Some observers mistakenly interpreted these events as the launch of campaign on escaping Vladimir Putin’s guardianship. However, there are some restrictions, mainly of policy and staff character that make success of such attempts in the near future rather doubtful. First of all, there are few people in the new president’s personal ‘staff pool’ and there is lack of real control over security related agencies. Last week appointments in the highest layers of power testified to the continuation of policies and retaining positions of leading elite groups formed over the past eight years. At the same time it became obvious that only members of the president’s personal ‘staff pool’ may count on promotion, while members of other elite groups relying on the successor preserved the status quo at best. Another tendency was formed, according to which, any attempt of the head of state to play independently will cause a counteraction by groups relaying on Vladimir Putin. Despite this system of checks and balances, the conflict environment in Russian elites has not calmed down. At the same time the format of this confrontation enables Vladimir Putin to control it in general, which confirms his status of supreme arbiter in disputes between centers of influence. The situation in the government regarding distribution of authority between ministries may serve as a vivid example of this. In particular, a dispute between the economic development ministry and the industry and trade ministry should be resolved at a meeting of the government presidium chaired by the prime minister. Major events May 19 - May 25, 2008
Volume: 15 pages If you are interested to obtain please contact » Elena Kim Other issues: |
Special report:Nord Stream 2 and Ukraine: Costs Should DecideShale Revolution: Myths and RealitiesLiquefied Natural Gas Outlook: Expectations and RealityAnalytical series “The Political compass”:Political power in Russia after presidential electionState Corporations in the Russian EconomyPolitical Results of 2007: Russia on the Eve of Power ShufflePolitical Landscape Ahead of the Parliamentary Election 2007«Centers of influence» in the Russian politicsLeading Russian corporations and the executive power: interaction methodsForecast of political developments after the presidential election in 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.National Energy Security Fund © 2007 |