|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Main page > Products > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts - The weekly bulletin > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (25) 713 Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (25) 713June 9 - June 15, 2008 Main political trends of the weekThere were no considerable changes in dominating trends last week. After slightly over a month since Dmitry Medvedev’s inauguration it is becoming more obvious that distribution of authority inside the duumvirate also covers branches of power. While Vladimir Putin retains absolute domination in the executive and legislative spheres, the successor enjoys if not total than quite considerable influence in the court system. At the same time, there has been growth in the activity of representatives of the juridical corporation who have been defending their rights more actively in conflicts with opponents. This is likely to lead to growth in influence of the judicial branch; however the latter will not oppose the other two branches. Last week reshuffle in the law enforcement agencies showed that the system of checks and balances typical of Putin’s style of governance also applies to them. In particular, although Investigation Committee head Alexander Bastrykin’s new deputies are loyal to him in general, they are not from the FSB, which means the latter has started losing control over the IC. At the same time radical siloviki evened the score in another area. Federal Drug Control Service’s new head Viktor Ivanov started mopping up his office from Viktor Cherkesov’s men and in the near future Ivanov’s protégés are expected to occupy key positions in the service. Besides, siloviki and law enforcement agencies continue competing for the right to spearhead the anti-corruption struggle. This confrontation is mainly of a virtual character because of two reasons at least. Firstly, direct conflicts in the security-related and law enforcement bloc cause strong discontent of Vladimir Putin and result in corresponding consequences. Secondly, struggle against corruption has been and will be mostly of an imitative and targeted character, because if there is a total assault at corrupted officials even the minimal functioning of the state apparatus will be doubtful. Unceasing struggle for assets results in quite interesting consequences. In particular, it modifies old alliances and creates new ones whose participants are members of different elite groups. Thus, there is mutual intertwining of interests that provides additional stability to the system on the whole, as separate players are not interested in ‘war till complete destruction’. Major events June 9 - June 15, 2008
Volume: 15 pages If you are interested to obtain please contact » Elena Kim Other issues: |
Special report:Nord Stream 2 and Ukraine: Costs Should DecideShale Revolution: Myths and RealitiesLiquefied Natural Gas Outlook: Expectations and RealityAnalytical series “The Political compass”:Political power in Russia after presidential electionState Corporations in the Russian EconomyPolitical Results of 2007: Russia on the Eve of Power ShufflePolitical Landscape Ahead of the Parliamentary Election 2007«Centers of influence» in the Russian politicsLeading Russian corporations and the executive power: interaction methodsForecast of political developments after the presidential election in 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.National Energy Security Fund © 2007 |