|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Main page > Products > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts - The weekly bulletin > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (32-34) 720-722 Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (32-34) 720-722July 29 - August 17, 2008 Main tendencies of political weekThe past three weeks cannot be called summer lull despite the height of the vocation season. The conflict in Transcaucasia became another durability test for the duumvirate and it has been passed successfully. At the beginning of August there was a prevailing opinion in the expert community that the created diarchic model of governance was stable only in case of inertial developments but in a crisis situation it would fail. The August events refuted such assumptions: a decision to respond toughly to Tbilisi’s actions was made quite quickly considering external limitations (the beginning of the Olympics and impossibility to discuss the problem at a personal meeting); the moves of both politicians were quite well-coordinated. At the same time attempts to consider political processes in Russia in the light of inevitable conflict between the teams of Vladimir Putin and Dmitry Medvedev have not stopped. Amid the conflict escalation the topic of the first 100 days in office of the new Russian president became secondary. In ‘peacetime’ it could have attracted much greater interest. The first results of Dmitry Medvedev’s governance provide for a conclusion that the new head of state acts (very likely he does it willfully) within the framework of the system built by Vladimir Putin and that he observes its rules, which does not rule out its evolutionary modernization in the future. At the same time the head of state does not give up attempts to broaden the base of his support at the expense of free territories, i.e. institutions and entities that are not in the sphere of Vladimir Putin’s interests. These are small and medium-sized businesses and the judicial system. The summer lull did not lead to decline in administrative conflicts. In particular, there was reshuffle in the defense ministry where people loyal to Anatoly Serdyukov strengthened their positions. Besides, the role distribution in the ministry was for the first time tested publicly: during the conflict the main speaker on purely military issues was the General Staff’s representative, not the defense minister. As far as agriculture minister Alexey Gordeyev is concerned, he kept on suffering local administrative defeats losing some administrative resources. Nevertheless, having an influential ally, first deputy PM Viktor Zubkov, the minister may try to win back what he has lost. Major events July 29 - August 28, 2008
Volume: 15 pages If you are interested to obtain please contact » Elena Kim Other issues: |
Special report:Nord Stream 2 and Ukraine: Costs Should DecideShale Revolution: Myths and RealitiesLiquefied Natural Gas Outlook: Expectations and RealityAnalytical series “The Political compass”:Political power in Russia after presidential electionState Corporations in the Russian EconomyPolitical Results of 2007: Russia on the Eve of Power ShufflePolitical Landscape Ahead of the Parliamentary Election 2007«Centers of influence» in the Russian politicsLeading Russian corporations and the executive power: interaction methodsForecast of political developments after the presidential election in 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.National Energy Security Fund © 2007 |