|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Main page > Products > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts - The weekly bulletin > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (34) 775 Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (34) 775August 17 - 23, 2009 Main tendencies of political weekLast week state authorities continued forming the agenda of the upcoming political season demonstrating their intention to become moderators of this process. Last year some groups tried to impose their view on the situation on the head of state and such attempts diminished only after promulgation of Dmitry Medvedev’s first presidential address. This time the president and his team initially made it clear that they intended to control the “process of targeting”; however, it does not mean the head of state will fully monopolize it. It stipulates a dialogue according to the rules established by the Kremlin; its participants include other entities such as political parties and the civil society in general. Last week state authorities sent a signal to all interested players having outlined an approximate time of promulgation of the address and its rough structure. The stage of filling in the content of the agenda that will be reflected in this document has begun. It is likely to be carried out through the lately tested format of meetings of the president with representatives of political parties and civil society. This will provide for the consideration of opinions of main systemic players and the document’s balanced language that will maximally satisfy all sides. However, attempts by some figures to impose their own agenda on state authorities did not stop. For example, some trade union leaders made alarmist statements about a soon social explosion in a number of regions. According to them, the stock of patience of workers has run out and they are ready for extreme measures while the police are not planning to suppress such protest actions. This is likely to be an attempt to play on phobias of state authorities and remind them of their rather shaky position in the autumn and winter when the economic decline looked catastrophic and irreversible. Informational interpretations regarding the anniversary of the 1991 events can also be viewed as attempts to form an alternative vision of the situation. Some experts rushed to declare that the repetition of that situation was allegedly possible nowadays and there were premises for that. In this situation state authorities preferred not to engage in polemics with them and staked on de-politicization of this memorable date. Judging by social surveys, this strategy is successful – the population’s attitude to the August 1991 events is changing; in the consciousness of people they are being supplanted by an abstract holiday – State Flag Day. Major events August 17, 2009 - August 23, 2009
Volume: 14 pages If you are interested to obtain please contact » Elena Kim Other issues: |
Special report:Nord Stream 2 and Ukraine: Costs Should DecideShale Revolution: Myths and RealitiesLiquefied Natural Gas Outlook: Expectations and RealityAnalytical series “The Political compass”:Political power in Russia after presidential electionState Corporations in the Russian EconomyPolitical Results of 2007: Russia on the Eve of Power ShufflePolitical Landscape Ahead of the Parliamentary Election 2007«Centers of influence» in the Russian politicsLeading Russian corporations and the executive power: interaction methodsForecast of political developments after the presidential election in 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.National Energy Security Fund © 2007 |