|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Main page > Products > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts - The weekly bulletin > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (43) 784 Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (43) 784October 19 - 25, 2009 Main tendencies of political weekTwo main informational lines that dominated the agenda a week earlier continued last week. One concerns the final stage of preparations for the presidential state of the nation address. This will lead to intensified cooperation of the Russian president and his executive office with different social groups and individuals who submit their remarks and proposals on the draft document. Just a month ago there were thousands of responses, while currently there are dozens of thousands of them. Moreover, the president actively attracts professional communities to the process of work on the document. Last week the head of state met with leaders of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs (RSPP) and discussed Russia’s post-crisis fate and modernization prospects. However, the analysis of results of the meeting questions the thesis that businesses may be automatically listed among allies of the president in his project of modernizing the country. The notorious parliamentary crisis provoked allegedly by falsifications at the October 11 elections ended with nothing. This conflict only revealed the vulnerability of the Russian opposition. Oppositionists failed to propose a distinct positive alterative to the course pursued by state authorities and staked on negative slogans like those of “the discontented”. Their post-electoral media campaign finished with an image defeat of the majority of its participants. Only communists, who were the last to return to the State Duma under a good pretext, managed to gain some dividends confirming their status of the leading opposition force. A meeting with the Russian president, the oppositionists had demanded so much, did not produce any result. Certain social groups and strata noticeably reinforced the pressure on state authorities forcing them to make concessions. Some players tried to use supposed phobias of authorities in their own interests. In particular, Channel 5 journalists interpreted a purely business issue of optimization of the personnel in a political manner threatening the country’s top officials with a “new Pikalevo” case. There were noticeable attempts of some mass media sources to stir hysteria about another protest action of motorists in the Primorsky Region, which was an attempt to play on state authorities’ phobias reminding of the last year events. Crisis tendencies in the non-systemic opposition reached its peak. Judging by indirect evidence, this camp is splitting into those ready to cooperate with state authorities on special conditions and “the irreconcilable”. Marina Litvinovich published a manifesto of the first group on Gazeta.ru and practically immediately was toughly criticized by leaders of the other group. The latter realize that such transformation threatens their personal power and new figures may start dominating in case of closer relations between the non-systemic opposition and state authorities. However, this trend cannot stop, because “the irreconcilable” understand that current state authorities are to stay in power for a long time. Major events October 19 - 25, 2009
Volume: 14 pages If you are interested to obtain please contact » Elena Kim Other issues: |
Special report:Nord Stream 2 and Ukraine: Costs Should DecideShale Revolution: Myths and RealitiesLiquefied Natural Gas Outlook: Expectations and RealityAnalytical series “The Political compass”:Political power in Russia after presidential electionState Corporations in the Russian EconomyPolitical Results of 2007: Russia on the Eve of Power ShufflePolitical Landscape Ahead of the Parliamentary Election 2007«Centers of influence» in the Russian politicsLeading Russian corporations and the executive power: interaction methodsForecast of political developments after the presidential election in 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.National Energy Security Fund © 2007 |