Main page > Products > The fuel and energy complex of Russia - Series of analytical reports > Export Strategy of Russia’s Oil and Gas Sector

Export Strategy of Russia’s Oil and Gas Sector

Export Strategy of Russia’s Oil and Gas Sector

In 2010 the Russian oil industry set an absolute record in terms of production. An oil pipeline to China has been launched this year expanding our potential of oil supplies to Asia. Diversification of export routes seemed to be quite a reasonable strategy on the background of growing production. Moreover, the demand of Asian states for energy sources is the most impetuous. Chinese and Indian economies are booming with their population getting richer, which contributes to fast increase in energy consumption in the region.

However, there are certain factors that should be taken into account. Despite a huge number of optimistic scenarios of the Russian oil and gas sector development, the situation is far from being optimal. Production may reach its peak already in 2011 to 2012; further growth is under question. Oil firms complain more and more often of taxation procedures and demonstrate willingness to make investments outside Russia actively entering production projects in various parts of the world. In this situation diversification looks as redirection of deliveries of hydrocarbons from the European to Asian markets, which turns it into a political project. As a result, division of Russian elites into pro-West and pro-Asia camps is becoming more apparent.

The situation in the gas sector is quite similar. A new gas accord with China was promised to be signed in June. But this did not happen, although negotiations continue. Since among new major projects only the Bovanenskoe deposit can boast a final investment decision, there is quite a logical question about the resource base of future supplies to the PRC. It is indicative that only the Altai project is being negotiated; this pipeline is to link old deposits of the Nadym-Purtazovsky district with China. The deposits already cater for the EU market, while China stubbornly refuses to pay a European price.

The report elaborates on the following issues:

  • Correlation of production and infrastructure potential

    • The analysis of the situation around construction of new pipelines in the western and eastern directions and prospects of filling them
  • Positions of major elite clans towards the state export strategy

    • Export priorities of different groups and companies
  • Gas and oil talks with China

    • Reasons for the failure of “the contract of the century”. Real interests of participants of the negotiations
    • First scandals around the oil pricing formula
    • Prospects of a gas agreement
  • Gazprom’s export monopoly and prospects of its abolition

  • Medium-term forecast of developments

The contents of the report::

Introduction 3
Chapter 1. Resource Base to Expand Exports of Russian Hydrocarbons: Economic Reality and Political Mystification 4
Chapter 2. Confrontation of Pro-Chinese and Pro-European Vectors of Russian Oil Exports 16
Chapter 3. Battles for Russian Gas Exports: Strengthening of Gazprom or Beginning of Demolition of Its Export Monopoly? 25
Chapter 4. Medium-Term Forecast of Developments 41
Date of issue: July 25th, 2011

If you are interested to obtain please contact » Elena Kim

Other issues:
Bookmark and Share

Analytical series “The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia”:

New OPEC+ Deal and Future of Oil Business in Russia
Gazprom on the background of external and internal challenges
Regulation of Oil and Gas Sector in 2019 and Prospects for 2020
Fiscal Policy on Oil and Gas Sector: Revised as Often as Wikipedia
The tax system in the oil and gas sector continues to undergo radical changes. The beginning of 2019 saw the introduction of a new tax regime: additional income tax. That experiment was supposed to start migration of the oil industry to an innovative principle of taxation: on profit, not revenue. It seemed that a new main road was found. In the same year, however, the Finance Ministry launched an overt offensive against AIT. The fear of loss of government revenue now is more powerful than the threat of causing oil production to collapse in the medium term because of a tax system that does not stimulate investment. The Finance Ministry would strongly prefer to speed up the tax manoeuvre completion that earns the state budget additional money. Oil and gas companies respond to this with individual lobbying, attempting to wangle special treatment for their projects.
Ukrainian Gas Hub: Climax at Hand
The “zero hour” comes in less than a month: the contracts for gas transit through Ukraine and for supplying Russian gas to the country terminate at 10 am on 1 January. Meanwhile, Gazprom and Naftogaz are very far from looking for a mutually acceptable solution. The entire European gas business is watching intently the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. Everyone is waiting for a new “gas war”: the January 2009 events proved to be a serious test both to European consumers and to Gazprom as a supplier. Is there still a chance of agreement? If there is not, will Gazprom cope with its obligations to deliver gas to Europe? Is Russia bluffing as it assures that the new infrastructure and gas in underground storage facilities will enable it to get by without Ukrainian transit even as soon as this winter? What will happen to Ukraine itself at the beginning of 2020?

All reports for: 2015 , 14 , 13 , 12 , 11 , 10 , 09 , 08 , 07

Rambler's Top100
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts
Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.
National Energy Security Fund © 2007

LiveInternet