Main page > Products > Special reports > Shale Revolution: Myths and Realities

Shale Revolution: Myths and Realities

Shale Revolution: Myths and Realities

The boom in shale gas production in the US and its wide-ranging influence on markets rocked the gas world. Liquefied gas deliveries were redirected, altering the already fragile balance of demand and supply in traditional markets for pipeline gas in Europe.

The psychological effect proved just as strong. Many began to speak about a "shale revolution," a technological breakthrough, and an upcoming realignment of the global gas industry.

Major corporations began to look for opportunities to participate in this business. The governments of nations depending on the import of gas see in shale their salvation and freedom. Experts predict a decline of the "era of diktat" on the part of conventional natural gas exporters.

As is the case with every fashion trend, however, there is a great deal of emotion involved, and it is only in time that one begins to realise the potential lifespan of the trend and its objective limitations. Still, we will try look into this matter seriously and without making "hot-on-the-heels" conclusions.

The report elaborates on the following issues:

  • Technological and commercial reasons for the growth of shale gas production in the USA
  • The reality of the "export of revolution". Challenges and opportunities for the development of shale gas in the EU
  • The prospects of shale gas in China
  • The Russian experience in shale gas
  • Forecast of production of shale gas and its impact on the global gas market

The contents of the report:

Introduction 2
Background 2
Shale Rush 3
Global Reserves 4
Chapter 1. US Shale Boom 5
1.1. Growth in Shale Gas Production in US 5
1.2. Reserves: US Shale ‘G6’ 6
   1.2.1 Barnett Shale () 7
   1.2.2 Fayetteville Shale (Arkansas, Eastern Oklahoma)) 9
   1.2.3. Woodford (Oklahoma) 10
   1.2.4. Haynesville Shale (Louisiana, Eastern Texas) 11
   1.2.5. Marcellus (Northwest of US) 12
   1.2.6. Antrim Shale (Michigan) 12
   1.2.7. New Albany Shale (Illinois, Indiana, Northern Kentucky) 13
1.3. Official, Corporate Forecasts of Sector Development 13
Chapter 2. United States Shale Boom Economics, Environmental Issues 15
2.1. Gas Prices in US 15
2.2. Economics of Shale Projects, Financial Position of Gas Companies 18
2.3. Slow Reaction of Oil & Gas Corporations 21
2.4. Environmental Issues of Shale Development 24
Chapter 3. Export of Shale Revolution to Europe, China: Realities and Myths 26
3.1. EU Shale Reserves, Grounds for Shale Rush 27
3.2. European Countries’ Shale Development Successes, Failures 28
   3.2.1.  Poland 28
   3.2.2.  Sweden 29
   3.2.3.  UK, Netherlands 30
   3.2.4.  Austria 30
   3.2.5.  France 30
   3.2.6. Germany, Hungary 31
   3.2.7.  Ukraine 31
3.3. Stimuli, Limiters 31
3.4. Chinese Gas Market 33
3.5  Shales in China, Coal-bed Methane Production 34
Chapter 4. Shale Future: Is It Worth the Effort? 37
4.1. Development Prospects for US Shale Gas Business 37
4.2. What Dreams May Come: What ‘Shale Project’ in Europe Costs 39
4.3. China Unconventional: Pricing Revision 41
4.4. Shale Potential in Russia 42
Date of release: June, 2010

 

 


If you are interested to obtain please contact » Elena Kim

Other issues:
Bookmark and Share

Analytical series The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia:

Druzhba Pipeline Accident: Key Implications
New OPEC+ Deal and Future of Oil Business in Russia
Gazprom on the background of external and internal challenges
Regulation of Oil and Gas Sector in 2019 and Prospects for 2020
Fiscal Policy on Oil and Gas Sector: Revised as Often as Wikipedia
The tax system in the oil and gas sector continues to undergo radical changes. The beginning of 2019 saw the introduction of a new tax regime: additional income tax. That experiment was supposed to start migration of the oil industry to an innovative principle of taxation: on profit, not revenue. It seemed that a new main road was found. In the same year, however, the Finance Ministry launched an overt offensive against AIT. The fear of loss of government revenue now is more powerful than the threat of causing oil production to collapse in the medium term because of a tax system that does not stimulate investment. The Finance Ministry would strongly prefer to speed up the tax manoeuvre completion that earns the state budget additional money. Oil and gas companies respond to this with individual lobbying, attempting to wangle special treatment for their projects.

All reports for: 2015 , 14 , 13 , 12 , 11 , 10 , 09 , 08 , 07

Rambler's Top100
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts
Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.
National Energy Security Fund © 2007

LiveInternet