Main page > Products > The fuel and energy complex of Russia - Series of analytical reports > Arctic and other offshore projects in Russia

Arctic and other offshore projects in Russia

Arctic and other offshore projects in Russia

Moving production from the land to the offshore area is a worldwide tendency of the oil and gas sector development.

Main discoveries are made offshore where major part of launched deposits is located. This global trend has reached Russia.

State companies have long been eagerly engaged in distribution of offshore fields. The question is when there will be a serious breakthrough in oil and gas production.

So far we can boast of just occasional success that has not turned into a systemic trend. Moreover, the Arctic fever still continues in Russia: officials are actively discussing the Arctic future, and the topic of the Arctic development is becoming a key one.

This is stirred up by estimations of western analysts who argue that main Arctic reserves may be located in the Russian zone. Yet, this nice talk about the Arctic future should move towards practical actions.

A new report elaborates on the following issues:

  • State policies in the Arctic and offshore areas

    • The executive power will undergo serious reshuffle this May. However, in conclusion state institutions are preparing adoption of strategic documents on developing offshore fields. The question is whether they will repeat the fate of other strategies that became a pile of hollow papers.
  • Taxation regime for offshore production

    • Different projects of changes in taxation of offshore production are discussed. There are two ways – to make exceptions for certain projects or to fundamentally alter the fiscal system. There are proposals based on the Brazilian and Norwegian models. There are ideas to replace the minerals production tax with the gross receipts tax using the ad valorem rate in percentage points or to introduce the tax on financial results. It is important to understand what newly elected president Putin is up to.
  • Licensing policies

    • Back in 2008 shelf deposits were declared strategic, which led to corresponding consequences. Licenses were given only to state companies that had experience of offshore activities. However, private companies more and more actively criticize this regime accusing state companies of license collection without intention to develop fields. Before the elections Putin promised to liberalize access to the shelf. Some ministries adhere to the same position. Meanwhile, state companies may well become private in several years. So, there will be changes, but the question is about their scale and time.
  • Foreign partners

    • Complexity of tasks Russian companies are facing on the shelf in general and in the Arctic in particular, creates the necessity to actively form partnerships with nonresidents. Conditions of their operation are vigorously debated.
  • Encumbrances of offshore operation

    • Shelf projects create not only new opportunities but also serious difficulties. First of all, this concerns ecological restrictions, as well as attempts to make developers buy Russian equipment and services. Participants of offshore projects are viewed as fat cats that can be persuaded to buy something else.
  • Struggle for investments in shipbuilding

    • As an incentive to develop Arctic projects the state promises to invest in construction of corresponding infrastructure. In particular, a huge shipbuilding program is discussed. The question is who will draw these huge resources.

The contents of the report:

Introduction 3
Chapter 1. State attempts to work out strategy of offshore and Arctic development 5
Chapter 2. Rules of the offshore operation game. Changes in Russian offshore field legislation. Taxation 12
  2.1. Who can work on Russian shelf 12
  2.2. Tax treatment of offshore projects 19
  2.3. Additional burden on offshore projects as part of the system of administrative control 25
Chapter 3. Struggle of administrative and political clans for shipbuilding assets 32
  3.1. General problems of Russian shipbuilding industry 32
  3.2. Shipbuilding interests of main political clans 34
  3.3. Shipbuilding tasks under Yamal LNG project. Struggle for icebreaker fleet 37
  3.4. Problem of building gas tankers 44
  3.5. Struggle for Vyborg Shipyards and Gazprom fleet td> 47
Chapter 4. Prospects of developments 51
Date of issue: May 10, 2012

If you are interested to obtain please contact » Elena Kim

Other issues:
Bookmark and Share

Analytical series “The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia”:

New OPEC+ Deal and Future of Oil Business in Russia
Gazprom on the background of external and internal challenges
Regulation of Oil and Gas Sector in 2019 and Prospects for 2020
Fiscal Policy on Oil and Gas Sector: Revised as Often as Wikipedia
The tax system in the oil and gas sector continues to undergo radical changes. The beginning of 2019 saw the introduction of a new tax regime: additional income tax. That experiment was supposed to start migration of the oil industry to an innovative principle of taxation: on profit, not revenue. It seemed that a new main road was found. In the same year, however, the Finance Ministry launched an overt offensive against AIT. The fear of loss of government revenue now is more powerful than the threat of causing oil production to collapse in the medium term because of a tax system that does not stimulate investment. The Finance Ministry would strongly prefer to speed up the tax manoeuvre completion that earns the state budget additional money. Oil and gas companies respond to this with individual lobbying, attempting to wangle special treatment for their projects.
Ukrainian Gas Hub: Climax at Hand
The “zero hour” comes in less than a month: the contracts for gas transit through Ukraine and for supplying Russian gas to the country terminate at 10 am on 1 January. Meanwhile, Gazprom and Naftogaz are very far from looking for a mutually acceptable solution. The entire European gas business is watching intently the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. Everyone is waiting for a new “gas war”: the January 2009 events proved to be a serious test both to European consumers and to Gazprom as a supplier. Is there still a chance of agreement? If there is not, will Gazprom cope with its obligations to deliver gas to Europe? Is Russia bluffing as it assures that the new infrastructure and gas in underground storage facilities will enable it to get by without Ukrainian transit even as soon as this winter? What will happen to Ukraine itself at the beginning of 2020?

All reports for: 2015 , 14 , 13 , 12 , 11 , 10 , 09 , 08 , 07

Rambler's Top100
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts
Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.
National Energy Security Fund © 2007